The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 01:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Köprülü era (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: delete, hypothetically this category can easily be populated, since Köprülü era is the second half of the 17th century, but it would not be a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as too specific. All three articles have appropriate categories relating to Ottoman Empire at appropriate dates. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Rename. – Fayenatic London 16:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Redirects from Uyghur-language terms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Module:Lang is used by ((R from alternative language)) to determine the language name for the categories to populate. The name for the language per Module:Lang is Uighur instead of Uyghur, so the category Category:Redirects from Uyghur-language terms will always be empty and due to Category:Redirects from Uighur-language terms being red-linked until a few minutes ago, it would default any redirects with language code ug to the less precise Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms. As this category, with the current status of Module:Lang will always be empty, it should be deleted. TartarTorte 14:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural comment, rather than creating a parallel Category:Redirects from Uighur-language terms, Category:Redirects from Uyghur-language terms should have been nominated for renaming to Category:Redirects from Uighur-language terms. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Why?

  —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah that makes sense as if this fails, the cleanup would required probably deleting the other category. I can WP:G7 the category I created, if this is decided against. Sorry about that  Self-trout. TartarTorte 14:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:56, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 01:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Villages in Ternopil Oblast by hromada to Category:Villages in Ternopil Oblast

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. We usually do not categorize Villages by municipality so I have my doubts about the subcategory too. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I nominated the subcategory here. If that goes ahead this category will become empty. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge -- Unlikely to be populated. Unnecessary. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge Category:Proposed public policies and Category:Possible future political events into Category:Public policy proposals. ✗plicit 01:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Possible future political events to Category:Hypothetical recent political events

Nominator's rationale: I think the current title of this category is not too professional-souding. We could get a better title. All articles in this category are recent events. My proposal could be better I believe, but I think it could go along the lines of "Hypothetical". We could also expand the scope of this category to include all potential political events that did not take place, or delete it. Super Ψ Dro 22:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Category:Proposed public policies, the two categories seem to have the same purpose. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if they have the same scope. Super Ψ Dro 09:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• In any case they belong in the tree of Category:Proposals and they are both about politics. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge both to Category:Public policy proposals. Most of these seem to be speculation about events that might happen, but probably will not any time soon. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• That is fine with me as well. I have tagged Category:Proposed public policies to allow that. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Category:Possible future political events and Category:Proposed public policies to Category:Public policy proposals per above. --Privybst (talk) 15:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 01:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Films directed by Nelson to Category:Films directed by Nelson (director)

Nominator's rationale: The subject is Nelson (director). Kailash29792 (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - this is another speedy. Oculi (talk) 13:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 01:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:100 best films in the history of Ukrainian cinema (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization by list, on the basis of inclusion in an organization's proprietary Top 100 films list. List of the 100 best films in the history of Ukrainian cinema already exists, and has considerably more bluelinked films in it (56) than have actually been filed here (10) -- but we have an established rule that having been named to other organizations' subjective ranking lists isn't an appropriate basis for a category. Bearcat (talk) 02:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, also because 100 is an abitrary cutoff. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Classic WP:TOPTEN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- This is the selection chosen by the national film archive. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, subjective top-100. --Mvqr (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.