Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 10#Category:42-cylinder engines
Block evasion: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MARdF. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
TSventon, you added [17] very specific information to the World Architecture Festival page. That page was created by the organisers themselves, and mainly updated by SPAs. It's not possible to add so specific information to the page without explicit interest. You also created the dedicated page INSIDE Festival, which is part of World Architecture Festival. The World Architecture Festival is merely known by some architects. That organisation awards buildings, as the Prix Versailles does, but the Prix Versailles adresses also the large public. There are not many awards with this scope. I can't believe you are not acting here for the UK-based World Architecture Festival. Apart from the University of Oxford, up to now your job was mostly correcting typos. Since one month [18] @ GeneralNotability, Prix Versailles deleting has been a major part of your work [19]. As we can see, your will was clearly to delete Prix Versailles mentions in all wiki: "If Fr Prix Versailles is deleted, will fr Wikipedia remove other mentions of the prize?" [20] @ Blablubbs and Jules*. You worked conscientiously for that. And you organised WP:CAN canvassing with that purpose: "you are obviously welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles as well. If Prix Versailles is deleted, then mentions of the award in other articles will probably be removed as well" [21] @ Netherzone. You said to Possibly: "I'm no specialist" about architecture and design. That is not true. [22] All this reveals manipulation with a big conflict of interest for the benefit of a competitor. 95.140.7.136 (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
|