March 31
Category:Roku software
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Category doesn't make sense, as Roku isn't an operating system per se. It might make sense to have a category for services and channels carried by Roku, if that was a defining characteristic, but I don't think there are any. Trivialist (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete None of the categories entries are software. As the nominator said, Roku isn't an operating system....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. These are conventional media outlets that happen to have apps for streaming devices, not software, and Roku isn't an operating system. Being available on Roku devices isn't a WP:DEFINING characteristic of any of these per se — they all have apps available for every streaming device that a person might use, including Rokus and AppleTVs and Amazon Fires and proprietary-network smart TVs and Android devices and Xboxes and Bluray players and laptops and the plain old regular old school web, so it would be extreme category bloat to categorize them by every streaming device that exists. Bearcat (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:SESAC
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Too little content and there is no scheme of Category:Rights holders by industry trade group. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.