< October 16 October 18 >

October 17

Category:Sluggish schizophrenia researchers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article. Making a point rather than a categorisation. Rathfelder (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Bampton, Cumbria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat(s) for small villages with no likelihood of more content. Upmerge the contents. Sionk (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Masters Champions League cricketers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted. – Fayenatic London 15:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We don't have article on these teams which are not recognized as T20 cricket match. Greenbörg (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Add following to the discussion.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Los Dinos members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. -- Black Falcon (talk) 03:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These specific musicians were in Selena y Los Dinos, which is a band based on Selena's father Abraham Quintanilla Jr.'s much earlier band Los Dinos. Most of these musicians were barely born when Los Dinos existed.-- Mike Selinker (talk) 11:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Little Battlers Experience

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category that only contains the main article, episode list, and character list and there is no further potential to grow to be useful for navigation. WP:SMALLCAT —Farix (t | c) 10:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who are Buddhists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Misnamed and duplicative of the properly named (per our current naming conventions) Buddhist Wikipedians. I would also support deletion as I don't believe knowing a user's religion fosters encyclopedic collaboration, but I hesitate to advocate that outside of a group nomination of all religions. VegaDark (talk) 04:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians using Windows 8

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Violates WP:USERCAT as a category that does not foster encyclopedic collaboration. Precedent to delete "Wikipedians by operating system" categories was established here unanimously - To reiterate my rationale then, "Not helpful to Wikipedia to categorize users by what operating system they happen to use. I use Windows, but am not interesting in collaborating at all on topics related to Windows, nor am I more able than others to contribute to the article because I use Windows." There's no reason Windows 8 should get special treatment. VegaDark (talk) 04:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More