October 12
Category:Priests trained at King's College London
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was:
Relisted at 2016 OCT 25 CFD, since category was not tagged with Template:Cfm. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: I don't think it makes much sense to sub-categorise in this way. In that case you could end up with no end of sub-cats based on profession. This List of King's College London alumni already does a pretty good job of listing alumni by profession, and I think the newly created category is superfluous. Uhooep (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - didn't the theological dept of King's College / KCL have a function as a theological college, with its own qualification (the AKC)? That seems to me enough to justify keeping the clergy who trained there separate. Eustachiusz (talk) 11:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, we don't categorize alumni by later occupation or by former university department. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- WE should not categorise alumni by qualification earned. I have not looked to see if we may need also to merge to another target, e.g. Anglican clergy. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Madison, Tennessee
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Neighborhood of Nashville with just 2 entries. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nom. While a "People from City" category may, where useful for size management purposes, be subdivided by its actual incorporated and semi-distinct boroughs if such exist at all, it's virtually never appropriate or warranted to filter a city-level category all the way down to the level of an individual neighbourhood. For one thing, people frequently move from one part of the same city to another, making it often unmaintainable; for two, it's often not reliably sourceable — one of the two articles filed here features no mention of Madison whatsoever, and thus may very possibly have been filed here on the basis of someone's unverifiable personal knowledge of her home address. And for three, WP:SMALLCAT. The city-level category is all that's needed here. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.