< January 3 January 5 >

January 4

Category:Cemeteries in Lexington, Virginia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: 'merge. MER-C 12:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is but one page in this category. It is unlikely this category will ever contain more than a handful of pages. Also overcategorization: cemeteries in Virginia and a few of its principal cities are all we need IMO. pbp 23:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, Find A Grave lists EIGHT additional cemeteries beyond those I have described above.[6]--Jahaza (talk) 21:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Pilot Butte Members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pilot Butte (a town of about 2000 people) doesn't have a WikiProject. DexDor (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pennsylvania lieutenant governor elections (and Ohio)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Proper Adjectival form. and to match parent category Category:Lieutenant gubernatorial elections in the United States Naraht (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Grade I listed buildings in Glamorgan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 03:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rather anachronistic, considering Glamorgan hasn't existed for over 40 years. We don't have any other categories in this tree for historical super-counties such as Dyfed ...or Mid Glamorgan, South Glamorgan and West Glamorgan for that matter. For consistency and clarity the contents (modern county boroughs and unitary authorities) need upmerging to the general Wales parent category. Sionk (talk) 20:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. These are useful navigational categories as a tree, but they're rooted in the current county structure (i.e. what's going to be on a tourist's map today) and so we shouldn't base them on the pre-1973 counties.
Note that there don't seem to be any pages within these cats, merely a handful of sub cats. These should be relocated to the appropriate modern county (and are probably already there), rather than to the too-general "Wales". Andy Dingley (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The subcats are the current counties or county-equivalents (see Local government in Wales#Principal areas of Wales) so upmerge all per nom to "... in Wales" is correct. I have added the parent category Listed buildings in Glamorgan to the nomination, but there are some other subcategories of Glamorgan that need attention too. The buildings shouldn't be in an intermediate subcategory for the historic county of Glamorgan but should reflect modern administrative districts directly. BencherliteTalk 20:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Ham II (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Carniolan people of Slovene descent‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Carniolan people of Slovene descent‎
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:TRIVIALCAT, since Carniola was an ethnic Slovene country. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Museums in Carniola‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 11:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Museums in Carniola‎
Nominator's rationale: delete as anachronistic. The museums have been established in late 20th-century Yugoslavia (Slovenia) long after Carniola ceased to exist (it lost its independence in the Late Middle Ages, while the Duchy was formally disestablished in 1918). The articles are in Category:Museums in Slovenia already, so no need to upmerge. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Carniolan law‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Carniolan law‎
Nominator's rationale: delete, the 19th-century Carniolan lawyers who are in the child category had to cope with Austrian-Hungarian law rather than Carniolan law, after Carniola had been part of Austria(-Hungary) for many centuries. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Female winners of the Croix de Guerre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 03:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For conformity to existing categs in this area. 86.161.146.60 (talk) 14:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I created the category, but now I see the wisdom of this alternative wording. Do it! Pete unseth (talk) 20:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy per WP:C2C, bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, and WP:C2E, see above. RevelationDirect (talk) 22:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

University of Wales Institute, Cardiff

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 03:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The university changed its name in 2011. All articles have since been renamed, with the category tree remaining. Not sure if this would count as WP:C2D. Aloneinthewild (talk) 13:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Philippine pregnancy films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It seems to me that this is overly narrow. I don't see a compelling reason to separate these films out from the parent category -- and this is the only subcategory for a specific country. Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More