< November 17 November 19 >

November 18

Category:Hindu movements and organizations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 04:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Hindu movements and organizations to Category:Hindu movements and organisations
Nominator's rationale: Hinduism is the dominant way of life in India, which uses Indian English spelling. Hinduism was founded in India. The Hinduism article uses British/Indian spelling. Nearly 80% of Indian's are Hindu. 1,013,460,000 of the 1,070,000,000 Hindus live in India. I feel this meets the criteria of WP:STRONGNAT namely "An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the English of that nation". AusLondonder (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Czech people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 28. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: in accordance with this this earlier discussion, the polity in the Czech lands in these centuries was called Kingdom of Bohemia, while Czech nationalism did not start to flourish any earlier than in the 19th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of medieval Rus'

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename & merge to Category:Rus' people. – Fayenatic London 20:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT. Category:People of Rus only contains Category:People of medieval Rus'. I wouldn't object to a reverse merge either. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anglican pilgrimages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Anglican pilgrimage sites, influenced by the outcome of the discussion below and without prejudice to a future nomination to consider an alternative title that uses the word destinations. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: In the same vein as my other two noms: The articles are about sites, not the pilgrimages themselves, otherwise they'd be parented under the Category:Pilgrimages presumably rather than the Category:Pilgrim Centres. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Pilgrim Centres

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Ancient Hebrew pilgrimage sites, influenced by the outcome of the discussion below and without prejudice to a future nomination to consider an alternative title that uses the word destinations. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Ancient Pilgrim Centres to Category:Ancient pilgrimage sites
Nominator's rationale: Similar to my nomination of the parent cat: These are places to which pilgrims anciently made pilgrimage, whether central or otherwise; again, regardless of this proposal the "P" and "C" ought to be lower case. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pilgrim Centres

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Pilgrimage sites, without prejudice to a future nomination to consider an alternative title such as Pilgrimage destinations. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match the commons category and the formulation of at least one of the daughter categories. Other formulations such as lower case "Centre" would also be preferable to what is here, but I think that pilgrimage sites conveys that these are places to which pilgrims make pilgrimage, whether central or otherwise. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pilgrimage site is the usual name and not as narrow as Pilgrim Centre. --Bermicourt (talk) 07:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Commander cuisine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one page in this category, Cuisine of Commander Islands, which more properly (imho) belongs in the larger Category:Russian cuisine. Onel5969 TT me 18:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian chief digital officers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Chief digital officers. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Recently-created category with one member and limited scope. Purpose is unclear: the link following "The main article for this category is" goes to the redlinked Australian chief digital officers. WP:COP#By nationality and occupation does permit cats of this type, but we don't have a Category:Chief digital officers in which to group it (although we do have an article Chief digital officer), and we may not have cats for other nationalities either. The sole member of this category doesn't mention the term "chief digital officer" at all. Redrose64 (talk) 10:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Current Judges of the European Court of Human Rights

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 17:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We generally do not have separate categories for current and former holders of a position. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Oregon religious leaders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I've been creating a few new state-specific religious leader categories, but this was one that was anomalous before I started - all the others, both now and then use the format "Religious leaders from Foo", which is in line with most "People from (US State)" categories. All the religious leader-by-city categories also use this form. Either this one needs changing, or all the other religious leader-by-state categories do. Grutness...wha? 01:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

University of North Dakota athletics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per numerous media reports, the University of North Dakota has selected Fighting Hawks as its new nickname, resolving a long-running controversy. In order to bring the category structure in line with WP conventions, I propose the renaming above. Billcasey905 (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More