< November 7 November 9 >

November 8

Category:Music videos by Aardman Animations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 06:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. This would seem to be more suited to a list (which already exists somewhat at Aardman Animations#Short films) as the songs in the category aren't necessarily defined by what company animated a video for them. Sure "Slegdehammer" had a groundbreaking video but is the animator a defining aspect of the song? Also WP:OC#SMALL with no established scheme here. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Voice actors who committed suicide

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Voice actors who committed suicide to Category:Actors who committed suicide
Nominator's rationale: Irrelevant intersection. It was agreed at CFD in July 2007 to keep some of "Fooers who committed suicide" categories, including the parent Category:Actors who committed suicide.
The rationale for keeping those categories seems to have been that suicide is more defining in occupations in the public eye (such as actors and politicians) than in more private occupations. Whether or not anyone agrees with that conclusion, I don't see why it matters whether the person was a voice actor rather than a stage or film actor. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, they should. But since they aren't all nominated, start by merging the nominated category. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Porcelain Black

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not enough content for an eponymous category. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 December 25. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:15, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal A
  • Propose renaming Category:Tate Gallery to Category:Tate
  • Propose renaming Category:Directors of the Tate Gallery to Category:Directors of the Tate
Proposal B
  • Propose renaming Category:People associated with the Tate to Category:People associated with the Tate Gallery
  • Propose renaming Category:Collection of the Tate to Category:Collection of the Tate Gallery
  • Propose renaming Category:Tate structures to Category:Tate Gallery structures
Nominator's rationale: Proposal A was suggested at WP:CFDS, but it was opposed with the rationale, that it's ambiguous. I have no opinion on that, but the categories should consistently use either "Tate", "Tate Gallery" or a third option determined by consensus. I have no preference for either of them. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of speedy nomination
  • Category:Tate Gallery to Category:Tate – C2D, and to some degree C2C with Category:People associated with the Tate and Category:Collection of the Tate. --BDD (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Orkanger IF managers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete both--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Amateur clubs, which happened to have a notable footballer as their manager 20 and 15 years ago respectively, and this is the only member of these category. There is a small possibility that another notable would become manager in the future, but the chances that these category would grow to a reasonable size are slim. They should be deleted per WP:SMALLCAT Mentoz86 (talk) 13:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Orkanger IF

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Category:Orkanger IF, No consensus Category:Kongsberg IF. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous categories, with only the article itself as a member in addition to a sub-category with one member. These should be deleted per WP:SMALLCAT. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:BLP articles lacking sources from 2013

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#C1 (category empty for 4 days), without prejudice re-creation if anyone wants to subdivide Category:BLP articles lacking sources by year. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Empty category not likely to be filled. Rpyle731talk 08:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Thorpe Park attractions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge, following the established scheme in Category:Amusement rides by amusement park which mostly does not have sub-cats for amusements/rides. There is not sufficient consensus in this CfD to break the pattern. If an editor feels this is wrong in principle then start an RFC at the WikiProject. – Fayenatic London 12:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge. Upmerge to the parent cat and add Category:Amusement rides by amusement park to that one since none of the subcats there include "attractions" in their name. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nadia Ali

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Following category cleanup (including building categories for songs and albums and removing articles for songs and albums that weren't solo recordings) the remaining content doesn't justify an eponymous category. Looking through the material in the course of cleanup shows that it is well linked without the category. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Optimus Prime

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Images of Optimus Prime, and purge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Contains only the lead article and a redirect along with image files which, as I understand it, aren't supposed to be in mainspace categories. They should be migrated, or something? Regardless, the category isn't needed for the contents. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BIAS, anyone? --BDD (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AGF, anyone? Jerry Pepsi (talk) 21:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need 16 different images of Optimus Prime just to illustrate the character—most of them are covers of video games; screenshots to illustrate movies, TV shows, or comics; and the like. One is even primarily used to illustrate Ronald Reagan in comics—for that one, OP's appearance is secondary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
patience young padawan. The volunteer closers will be along shortly.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 13:51, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More