< July 8 July 10 >

July 9

Category:Albums by Max Bygraves

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus - jc37 09:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Albums by Max Bygraves to Category:Max Bygraves albums
Nominator's rationale: Merge, strays from Category:Albums by artist naming convention. KathrynLybarger (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Creation stories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Kbdank71 14:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Creation stories to Category:Creation myths
Nominator's rationale: Merge since this category is a sub-category of the creation myths category, and we obviously don't need them both. Creation myth is the standard term here. Ben (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Oklahoma Red Hawks players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: SPEEDY RENAME to Category:Oklahoma RedHawks players. Postdlf (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Oklahoma Red Hawks players to Category:Oklahoma RedHawks players
Nominator's rationale: Rename. The correct name for the team is the Oklahoma RedHawks [1]; the name of the category should follow the name of the team. Mackensen (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User talk archives

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 14:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User talk archives - (While it's a "fine line" (user talk space rather than userspace), and I don't necessarily oppose this being moved to WP:UCFD, I am listing this here.)
How is this category useful for navigation or collaboration to group disparate archive pages of every user on Wikipedia? I think Special:PrefixIndex takes care of this. (Not to mention the links that most editors place on their talk pages, either directly or through a template.) In addition, I think that most of the category membership is due to transclusion of Template:talkarchive or Template:talkarchivenav. - jc37 07:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Categories:Mexicans of Booian descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all. Kbdank71 14:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: for clarity and as per recent precedent. See discussion for nomination yesterday for Chileans of Booian descent at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 July 8 Mayumashu (talk) 03:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It s somewhat of a minor point perhaps, but not all immigrants to a country become citizens of that country (something that until recently I wasn t clear on [either?]). Non Mexican citizens should really be categorized under expatriates with indirect links to Mexicans by ethnicity/national origin Mayumashu (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I rather meant other important point which is the definition of nationality which is different in Western culture and Central and Eastern Europe. That's why we should be careful about similar categories for countries like Romania or Albania, where e.g. Hungarians are Hungarians, not Romanians of Hungarian descent. - Darwinek (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nationality meaning citizenship? are all or some ethnic Hungarians living in Romania citizens of Hungary and not of Romania? If so, then I see that is a concern. Others too are Russians living in former Soviet countries and Armenians living in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, arent they. Mayumashu (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No no, you don't understand. There is a huge difference between traditional ethnic minority and e.g. Moroccans in Belgium. E.g. Hungarians in Romania have mostly only Romanian citizenship but they are not of "Hungarian descent", they are Hungarians, same as they were 100 years ago, only borders have changed. They have own schools, press, organizations etc. Some of them even can't speak Romanian. They live there for hundreds years and are distinct. That's why countries recognise such minorities as official, unlike the communities of e.g. Moroccans, Iraqis etc. And that's why we should also reflect it and have categories like Category:Russians in Estonia. I recommend you reading some books by Benedict Anderson or Ernest Gellner by the way. - Darwinek (talk) 11:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Such groups are the true 'hyphenated Booians'. The problem with the naming 'Russians in Estonia' or 'Hungarians in Romania' is that it implies that the people described are those with Russian citizenship expatriate in Estonia and Hungarian expats in Romania. I think the better and likely best naming is 'Ethnic Russians in Estonia' and 'Ethnic Hungarians in Romania' Mayumashu (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is also good naming. Anyway, brief description in a category can always be provided, avoiding confusion of some readers. - Darwinek (talk) 19:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Fooian-Booian' as commonly described by Americans means no different, a citizen of Booia of partial or full Fooian descent, where descendency is not at all limited by percentage of ethnicity or number of generations between one and the immigration of one's forebearers. Besides this though, how could we go about limiting the inclusiveness - what is a Booian of Fooian descent / Fooian Booian with defining Fooian quality? No arbitrary limit satisfies Mayumashu (talk) 23:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category