The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 6 July 2005 14:03 (UTC)
Never a large category, now all the articles formerly in it have been merged into a single article, the only remening member of the category. DES 22:20, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 6 July 2005 14:01 (UTC)
IMHO a rather arbitrary criterium to categorite people. Also all these people are for one reason or another of encyclopedical relevance, why should the number of limbs be of primary interest? --Pjacobi 16:47, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 6 July 2005 13:58 (UTC)
A misnomer, since the army (like the British Army) has never had the "royal" appellation (unlike the Royal Australian Navy and Royal Australian Air Force). I suggest it be renamed Category:Australian Army. Grant65 (Talk) 02:05, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 6 July 2005 13:55 (UTC)
Duplicates Category:American Dad! (yes, the exclamation mark is part of the official title, though I probably would have stuck with the !-less version for the cat name). tregoweth 00:48, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)