The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Operator: §hep • ¡Talk to me!

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: Scan location-based categories and tag articles without coordinates as needing them.

Edit period(s): Until all location articles on Wikipedia are tagged as needing coordinates or they all have them, not continuous, batch runs of a few 100 or edits a week.

Already has a bot flag: Y

Function Details: I will scan location-based categories ie Category:Landmarks in Ohio, from that list I will scan the article for coordinates; either in an infoboxe or templates such as ((coord)). If the article lacks coordinates it will be tagged with ((coord missing|Subdivision)) ie ((coord missing|Ohio)). I would also like to be able to run with the "General Fixes" turned on, but not spell-check. If the article contains coordinates do nothing. Diffs 1, 2, 3. To ensure no double tagging, the page will be skipped if it contains ((coord missing.

• Approved for trial (15 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹoɟʇs(st47) 11:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Trial complete. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • ((BotWithdrawn)) In the mean time the task has been rigorously taken up by another bot, I'll withdraw to avoid confusion. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 02:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified the request above. Thanks. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 06:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --Chris 08:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Contribs start here. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 20:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 'Approved.'MBisanz ^talk 17:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.