The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Legoktm (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 16:27, Saturday August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: [1]

Function overview: Create un-punctuated redirects for SCOTUS cases.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): BOTR & VPR

Edit period(s): One big run, then weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: ~2,500 on the first run, then I'm not sure

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details:

Discussion[edit]

Seems to have consensus. Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — Earwig talk 05:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. See User:Legobot/SCOTUS, the first few it says already existed were ones I had created in an earlier run which didn't update the bot's log. LegoKontribsTalkM 20:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((BAGAssistanceNeeded)) LegoKontribsTalkM 00:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. — Earwig talk 04:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.