The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

FACBot 6[edit]

Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 01:51, Tuesday, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

Function overview: Go through all the Featured Articles, and merge certain templates in the ((Article History)) template.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Programming language(s): C#

Source code available: TBA

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#Most supports ever garnered in a FAC? see also Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GimmeBot 2 from 2007.

Edit period(s): A series of runs, doing more articles each time.

Estimated number of pages affected: There are 5,674 featured articles, but most should not require a change. FACBot has been performing this for featured articles upon promotion since 2014, but an error was found, under which not all peer review templates were merged.

Namespace(s): Talk

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Go through the talk pages of featured articles and merge the ((DYK)), ((featured article)), ((peerreview)), ((oldpeerreview)) and ((GA)) templates into the ((Article History)) template. If the article does not have an ((Article History)) template, then create one (but all FAs should already have one).

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Seems reasonable. Primefac (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trial conducted with 50 edits. Pages updated are list here. All looks good. Some improvements were made to error handling. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Hawkeye7: please remember to mark as ((BotTrialComplete)) when done, or we won't know that it isn't still in trial ;) --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Approved. Looks good to me. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.
Category