The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: BU Rob13 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 04:05, Thursday, April 28, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Auto-assess articles for WP:NFL

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

• Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Auto-assessment - Consensus for this task on an opt-in basis
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#Auto-Assessment_of_Unassessed_Articles - As a long-time member of this project, I requested it and there's been no objection for several days.

Edit period(s): As requested by project (initial one-time run, may recur if requested again in the future)

Estimated number of pages affected: Up to 3,517

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Auto-assesses the class within ((WikiProject NFL)) using class parameters in other WikiProject templates. Only auto-assesses to "standard" classes (stub, start, C, B, GA, FA, FL). Skips articles that have multiple "standard" classes. Will not auto-assess any other project templates.

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Please report back here after your run. — xaosflux ^Talk 09:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Thanks Xaos. [1] No errors. The only edit that looks a bit weird was here, but that was due to a misspelling of the class parameter by a previous editor, and assessment was still "needed". ~ Rob^Talk 12:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback solicited from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League - lets give them a couple of days to comment. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Alright, thanks. Hope you don't mind, but I moved your comment up one section to make sure it was clear what the trial was for. The section you originally placed it under was for a separate task that I was floating. ~ Rob^Talk 18:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial looks OK, I left note for the WP of the completion as well, if no objections or concerns to deal with will approve in a couple of days. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.