The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zone X[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The brand is not notable enough. There are very few (if any) press mentions for it. At best it should be redirected to Imperial Tobacco. Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: or should it be redirected to Skruf Snus that manufactures it? Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is entirely generic product. No standalone notability, so no need for redirect. scope_creep^Talk 19:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.