The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zoklet[edit]

Contested prod. A non notable forum that fails WP:WEB. The article supplies no independent, reliable sources and none appear to be available on searching. Nuttah (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I prodded this article after finding it on the WP:NPP backlog. It appears to me that it violates WP:WEBSITE as the nominator has stated, and I was unable to locate sources confirming notability. The prod lasted almost six days, during which time copyrighted material had to be removed which was added by the person who removed the prod. ZabMilenko^{How am I driving?} 21:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:WEB there appear to be no independent sources for this web site promotion (and there are none in the article). Johnuniq (talk) 10:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.