The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 22:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zimdesk[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion under criteria A7 for not claiming notability. It is an open source software product. The speedy tag was on for some considerable time with no admin either removing it or deleting the article, so the issue of the notability is evidently not a simple one. No vote from me. Sam Blacketer 18:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Assertion of notability is very weak, but it at least does get mentioned in one of the third-party references. May need to relist this. --Sigma 7 11:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as some of the external links are WP:RS. Relist if necessary. Bearian 19:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck 04:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like spam - and there's no footnotes so there's no way to tell what they are referencing. I'll tag it in case the article gets kept. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 13:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while the concept of cloud computing might be a notable/referenced concept, this software in-and-of itself is not. The "references" (read: external links) may be reliable but they do not directly deal with the subject of this article (the software Zimdesk). /Blaxthos 16:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.