The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creep (talk) 09:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zerto[edit]

Zerto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Zero coverage, fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH. Quite an old article but never really been sourced, and slightly promotional. scope_creep (talk) 08:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Weak Keep per scope_creep; a highly WP:PROMOTIONAL article on a not-notable company. Chetsford (talk) 06:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep could use a refresh, but flagship product Reviewed two weeks ago in PCmag.com https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2500054,00.asp Vonfraginoff (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Vonfraginoff. Since nomination I have included that pcmag reference and made the article more product than corporation focused and hopefully edged down promotional aspects a little. Wish I had more time to work the product detail up a little.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I'm convinced by the independent pcmag review above (+ a few others I see in a search) that the company's main/sole product - "Zerto Virtual Replication" - is notable. The company is probably notable as well (e.g. see these items in Calcalist - [1][2], which interestingly - notability wise - [3] excludes them in 2018 on the basis of "The following list does not include six of Israel’s most successful technology startups: online payments company Payoneer Inc., content distribution companies Taboola Inc. and Outbrain Inc., disaster recovery software company Zerto Inc., data storage company Infinidat Ltd., and mobile and web monetization company IronSource Ltd.. Having grabbed the top spots on Calcalist’s ranking in previous years, we believe these companies, some already generating annual sales in the high hundreds of millions, have already matured beyond the scope of the current list."), and it doesn't seem to make sense, in this case, to have a separate company and product page. Icewhiz (talk) 12:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I think the pcmag is enough to establish notability. Chetsford I would like to withdraw this, if your cool about it. scope_creep (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw nomination scope_creep (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.