The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure, non-notable band that claims to be an Internet sensation. Does not pass WP:BAND, WP:WEB or WP:RS. Warrah (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage by reliable third party sources, nothing but YouTube and MySpace, one unreleased album. Does not pass WP:BAND or WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 22:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No third party sources, couldn't find anymore than J04n did. Article has one link to MySpace that wouldn't open for me and a link to a YouTube channel, that the YouTuber has closed, containing no videos. —Sandahl (♀) 23:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources in the first 5 pages of googles hits and zero google news archive hits. Totally non-notable. (And also terrible). YilloslimeTC 06:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MUSICBIO badly; YouTube videos are not nearly enough to merit inclusion. Seems to lack significant coverage by reliable third parties. Cocytus[»talk«] 02:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.