The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 10:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yummypets[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/FlorianGr with few other contributions outside this topic. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this promotional text about a company that fails WP:NCOMPANY. The article's creator and the main contributor are SPAs. -The Gnome (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The sources are a mixture of passing start-up coverage for the website and announcements of the company's funding and participation in a start-up accelerator: not I think sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. It is unclear what happened with the company's smart collar promised for 2015-6 [1] (around the same time as others such as Dogtelligent were gaining coverage), which might provide a second angle on which to consider the company. Overall I am not seeing the in-depth coverage needed to demonstrate notability, whether as a company or a social media site. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.