The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Young Democrats of North Carolina[edit]

Non-notable state federation of Young Democrats of America--RedShiftPA (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a List of state Democrat organisations.-- TreasuryTag talkcontribs 19:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ORG as has been done for similar state federations. After deletion, consider a redirect to Young Democrats of America to discourage re-creation of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Young Democrats of North Carolina was the founding chapter of the Young Democrats of America, they are an historic chapter with 80 years of history with notable state leaders such at Governor Jim Hunt and U.S. Senator Terry Sanford as past Young Democrats of North Carolina presidents. This historic value of this organization alone is enough of a reason not to delete it. --Kalliope O'Donnell (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's clearly properly referenced. We should encourage them for all states and all parties. Deleting this for one of the two major parties in the US is absurd. Eclecticology (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect with/to North Carolina Democratic Party - this isn't particularly notable in and of itself. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --VS ^talk 11:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ORG. We don't need articles on every state caucus of the Young Democrats of America. --Dhartung | Talk 22:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Young Democrats of North Carolina predates the Young Democrats of America. Does wikipedia have some policy that bigger is better? See discussion on the page for verification of this standard: "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Ncperspective (talk) 02:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.