The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 20:45, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yogscast[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Yogscast" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Unremarkable podcast - repeatedly recreated and deleted as part of a promotional effort by the podcast to appear credible. Other than number of viewers, no significant claims notability, and I believe the provided references from reliable sources only show minor coverage, or are from unreliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This new source from 10 July 2012 is not trivial. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep Previously this has always been deleted due to no claim of importance. It now has a claim of importance. Speedy delete is clearly not appropriate here as it has been controversial to delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep The subject has gained notability since then. There are many articles from reliable sources cited, including from Edge Magazine, PC Gamer, Salon magazine, and the BBC. (There are a number of nonreliable sources used also, but that warrants cleanup rather than deletion.) I am pretty sure there is enough coverage from reliable sources to establish notability. Belegdal (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the subject of the article has received significant outside coverage and meets WP:N Ducknish (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to pass the GNG, though some of the fluff in the article does get in the way. --MASEM (t) 01:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two PC Gamer articles are just about enough to pass WP:GNG, and assuming Edge Online is a good source, that would be at least four instances of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Some of the sources are pretty bad though, and the article needs some serious clean-up. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- @Torchiest: Edge is listed as a reliable source per WP:VG/S. PC Gamer and Edge also have articles about the Yogscast in their print magazines, and several other online articles not cited in this page (I count five total at Edge Online) Belegdal (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for that link, which makes this an even clearer keep. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 19:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - No problem :) Belegdal (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - BBC News, PC Gamer and Edge Magazine are reliable sources that all provide significant coverage. Also covered at IGN and Gamezone [1], [2]. --Teancum (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.