The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 07:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yogesh Shouche[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBIO. All references are Primary and associated with the organization that the individual works for. Hagennos (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this person meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (academics), he is a scientist at a major national research institute and has as significant number of well cited works (see google scholar and this). Specifically he works for the National Centre for Cell Science at Savitribai Phule Pune University. All this is referenced in reliable sources, and these sources do not need to be independent because of the policy to prevent unfair discrimination against academics. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PROF#C1 with a GS h-index of 42. I made a first attempt at cleaning the page up and making it read less like an advertisement. XOR'easter (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROOF. The current version of the article, post-cleanup, is not promotional; suitable as a start-class article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep. Large citation base. Agricola44 (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:PROF#C1.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.