The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yendri[edit]

Yendri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person (musician). Does not meet any of the WP:BAND criteria (for composers nor musicians). I did some extensive Googling for third-party references and found one album review by a non-notable online "publication". The only other items were typical artist-related profile sites, and a few archived forum posts asking whether she was a man or not. bllix (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (tell me stuff) 17:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The only WP:BAND criteria that the subject even comes within a mile of is "releasing two or more albums on an important indie label". While a couple of the other bands on Mental Ulcer Forges do have their own articles so are presumably notable (though that might need to be looked at...), it doesn't seem anything like enough for them to be considered a respected indie label. Given that the subject is German I suppose it is possible that there are some German language sources that aren't coming up in Google searches but absent any new info I can't see any reason to not delete it Robinr22 (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.