The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yann Borgstedt[edit]

Yann Borgstedt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, especially since notability is not inherited. The article was a created by an WP:SPA. Rentier (talk) 05:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with nominator. Fails BASIC and GNG. Lacypaperclip (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG, and WP:NOTPROMOTION. There are also significant WP:RS issues due to non-independence. - GretLomborg (talk) 21:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Rentier. He doesn't meet GNG. Several of the sources used are not independent, and coverage via valid sources is trivial.JSFarman (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The_Womanity_Foundation, the AfD discussion for and article created by the same by the same WP:SPA as this one, about the organization this guy founded. - GretLomborg (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've added some references to re-inforce WP:GNG and did some clean-up. Hmlarson (talk) 21:31, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Agree with the nominator. Some of the sources are questionable under WP:PUS Rrachet (talk) 15:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.