The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 05:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Now slightly (but poorly) sourced. Entertainer with no apparent notability. ViridaeTalk 06:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources in the article are enough to show notability. For example [1] is solely about the topic in a major newspaper. Hobit (talk) 06:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Virtually unknown in the 'English' world but notable known person in Israel. HE WP article is more developed, article is a few years old with edits and uncontested. --Shuki (talk) 22:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow/Speedy Keep. Per above keeps.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.