The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yaesu VX-150[edit]

Yaesu VX-150 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There is no indication that this product would pass WP:PRODUCT. PROD was contested with comment: "Old article was created before Wikipedia required sources or claims of noteworthiness." That may be true, but it's not a reason to keep the article. B. Wolterding (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, or merge with manufacturer's article (if known) per WP:PRODUCT. Ben MacDui^Talk/Walk 09:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The manufacturer is Yaesu (brand). However, I don't see why building a catalog of their present and past products would improve that article. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.