The result was no consensus. The "keep" !votes in the beginning are rather vague and weak. However, Ism schism has provided sources, which have not resulted in discussion for three days. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's no coverage in idependent reliable sources to establish notability. Gaura79 (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per Shruti14. The subject is notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Once there is analysis about specific sources that establish notability, the discussion can be closed. Cunard (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete per Admin's comments. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]