The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Lolfa[edit]

Y Lolfa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Y Lolfa appears to be little more than advertising for a printing company. There is little to substantiate anything notable about the company. Y Lolfa does not meet the primary criterion for a company specified in WP:COMPANY. Dolphin51 (talk) 11:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I think the article now contains adequate sources to pass the notability test. There's likely to be a bounty of further material in Welsh if any speaker of the language wishes to dig it up. Gr1st (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sufficient references for notability.DGG (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Publishes widely used Welsh courses, dictionaries; an imprint has a novel currently shortlisted for James Tait Black Prize. Yes, i know its product doesn't prove the notability of a company, but i believe it goes towards it. Rhydypennau (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.