The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 14:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Xesam[edit]

Xesam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a desktop search specification that is sourced mostly from company and partially through related product information. Interestingly, a company statement about a new, stable, finally realized 1.0 version came after the Linux Magazine reporting of merging ontologies with Nepomuk. I was unable to find breadth and depth of coverage in RS with which to improve sourcing/information. Did find a W mirror. Don't see as meeting the WP:GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Not finding much coverage in rs except for this 3 ¶ article. Does not meet WP:N at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.