The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. and I'll consider SALT based on my discretion j⚛e decker^talk 04:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

XUVO[edit]

XUVO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, sourced by press releases, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Note that creator is a declared paid editor. Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The more it is edited, more promotional it looks. Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing there for sources but press releases, appears to be here as a product promotion. XeroxKleenex (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Seems like deletion discussion begun 3 days before the article's creation! Something smells bad here... --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Found it in the deletion log. I'm guessing that the closing admin forgot to close this discussion at the same time. Changing my recommendation to...
    • Speedy Delete and SALT. This article is now a recreation of a previously speedy deleted article by a banned user. XeroxKleenex (talk) 05:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The reason that the article was created after the Afd was begun, is that the same article was speedily deleted as a SCD G-5 on 12 August 2014, and immediately recreated. --Bejnar (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per nom. 1292simon (talk) 03:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.