The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. after improvements to the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

XOLO[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn by nominator based on recent addition of reliable sources.
Doesn't meet WP:CORP . Not inherently notable - does have a partnership with Liverpool FC. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as fails WP:CORP & is more like an advert then anything!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Speedy Keep per below.[reply]

Comment: I'm finding some reviews of their products in reliable sources, so I'll list them on the page as I find them in a products section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think that the promotional tones are unintentional and are more just because the user is a new, young editor that's writing about something he is particularly fond of. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: Read this, don't need more to explain. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.