The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. cryptocuurency does not discuss this subject so is not a suitable redirect target SpinningSpark 01:54, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

XCurrency[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded by creator (ping prod poster, User: Jinkinson). I agree with his assessment. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)/Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirements. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Current sources inadequate to justify notability. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect XCurrency fails WP:GNG but it constitutes a plausible search term and so deleting the page would be wasteful. I see two options here: one is to redirect XCurrency to cryptocurrency (((R to related topic))), the other is to redirect it to currency (((R from misspelling))). My personal preference is for the former; either is preferable to outright deletion. Iaritmioawp (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.