The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wyngz[edit]

Wyngz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:PRODUCT, being a glorified brand name. The USDA has a lot of guidelines for food labeling, in and of themselves I don't think they qualify for notability. All other coverage I found was either just restating the USDA guidelines or aggregating late-night news jokes. Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.