The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I agree with what the previous user wrote. The article lacks notability or credibility, even if some of its content is factual. 129.98.212.144 05:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Will change to keep if independent reliable sources are cited that confirm the subject's notability. --- Skapur 21:35, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable, no sufficient sorces. Hiddenhearts 17:45 UTC, 25 December 2006
Delete Read's like an E-Fed Bump Speedy if possible NegroSuave 14:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete n-n. DaveApter 10:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.