The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g1, nonsense, obvious violation of WP:NFT. NawlinWiki 16:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wuts that ham[edit]

Wuts that ham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Non-notable Internet meme started by the author of the article. Prod removed by author after he changed "meme" to "joke", claiming that negated the prod. JuJube 03:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not notable. --- RockMFR 03:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR CoI non-notable cruft. Unverifiable self-indulgence. Wikipedia is not a web host. -- IslaySolomon | talk 03:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not a bad picture from a video game, but, well, it doesn't warrant keeping an article for a picture. --Dennisthe2 04:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per IslaySolomon. --Sopoforic 05:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, yet another non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 06:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment "Wuts that ham" also gets 0 Ghits. JuJube 06:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.