The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World Professional Kickboxing League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a defunct kickboxing organization that lacks independent sources. Even if the unsourced claims of having notable fighters compete in it is true, an organization's notability is not inherited from its members. My search did not turn up any significant independent coverage. Since it's not listed among the significant organizations at WP:KICK, I'd conclude it was a minor organization even when it existed.Mdtemp (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks the significant coverage required by WP:GNG. I think the nominator's comments sum it up nicely. Papaursa (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.