The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:SNOW v/r - T P 01:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Marketplace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of several attempts by the same author to promote his software company. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:GNG andy (talk) 12:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as with this user's other creations, this is WP:ARTSPAM. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMOTION. Yunshui 雲水 12:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was my bulk articles which I had never edit to the open Wikipedia space. They were in my working folder!!!

From: User: Interface Designer By education I am a philologist. I worked as an editor for several years, speak several languages. I am the author of many scientific works and think I would be useful for the Wikipedia. Now I need you urgent help, please. Some of my articles are marked as speedy deletion by the user who is not an administrator, has a very bad reputation in WIKIPEDIA (see his history) User:Andyjsmith and is acting as a Vandal: talk He does not appear on the wiki for years, then begins to remove all that he see on his way. That is called: Vandalism Take a look please at his history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luthorsteele http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Andyjsmith&limit=500&action=history

This is my articles which he deleted without any talk with me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Hosting_Provider
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Marketplace

Please help me and block this user as he is acting as a Vandal

Thank you very much for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Interface Designer (talk • contribs) 12:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Interface Designer (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Interface Designer[reply]

I think you may be confusing User:Andyjsmith (who is in pretty good standing with the community) and User:Luthorsteele (who is a blocked vandal). The CSD templates applied to your other articles were absolutely correct, as evidenced by their subsequent deletion. Andy has filed this AfD discussion because, once again, you are adding unsourced promotional to Wikipedia, despite the numerous warnings on your talkpage. Yunshui 雲水 12:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luthorsteele is a blocked vandal, and was appropriately warned by Andy for gross vandalism before he was blocked. I fail to see the relevance of your assertion. You are wandering into personal attacks on an editor who appropriately nominated what is clearly non-notable and borderline spam for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 13:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMOTION. Creator also has an obvious COI and his only edits are Spam and accusing another user of Vandalism for nominating his articles for deletion. Vrenator ^talk 12:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero indication of wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 13:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not establish notability. Actually it doesn't even attempt to do so. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interface Designer added the comments below mine before I made this comment; I've put mine up here so that it wouldn't get lost. He used multiple subject headers of the two-equals-signs variety; I've reduced all of them to four equals signs so that they wouldn't cause section header problems with the AFD log. Nyttend (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsed notes from article creator
Good afternoon, let me add few words in response to your strange accusations and group comments about me and some of my articles. About the company[edit] Before you put on the deletion it would be not bad to see what you are removing, and have a look in some original sources. I will not enumerate all, but merely point out three things only: Rated turn over of the company's World Marketplace last year was $ 1,427,000.000.00. It owns 4 large global banks. It operates simultaneously on 84 international markets. Conclusion: World Marketplace hardly needs advertising in Wikipedia. In general, people in this system involves a friendly attitude, an optimistic approach and a lot of completely free services ( for example: all money transfers are commission free to the bank or free hosting, free domain name, etc. ) About the article World Marketplace[edit] In principle, it can be removed, if you want to do it. I do not care about that. Just one thing I would ask you to do: please make removement as soon as possible. It is very desirable to look at this page now. Since the terrible inscription "This article is being considered for deletion ..." can not decorate such respectable System like Wikipedia. It's not just my opinion. If you decide to leave this article, by adding a few lines, I think, the World will be very grateful to you. About me[edit] I wrote a few words about myself. Something will have to be repeated. I'm not a young boy. And Wikipedia is not for money (I have enough money, thank God), and not because I need a career (I've been once working as an editor of a prominent journal, but it's long past time ago. I do not think to move back to this stage). In fact now I have, unlike many people, free time and I can afford to publish some of my useful life ideas. I think they can bring tangible benefits to mankind in various fields: from micro to macro space, from small to large businesses, from microbiology to medicine. This is one reason why I'm in Wikipedia. The second reason: I'm more and more attracted by all positive, constructive and, at the same time, disinterested things. In all this lies a gigantic power. At the biggining Wikipedia was also disinterested. General opinion[edit] I'm just 24 days in Wikipedia. In that short time I have seen here a lot of interesting ideas and met nice people. I can not say about everyone, but about some patrols can say this: behind the mask of an instantaneous speedy removals of articles with unselfish in words, lies hidden vandalism and as always happens in such cases: someone's serious interests, visible by the naked eye. People here tend to operate in pairs user (User talk:Andyjsmith) + user's administrator who help him (User talk:Nyttend), and sometimes catching up friends (User talk:Yunshui) to solve some of there questions. It's not a secret that all around and even inside Wikipedia industry is making money, but to the outside observer it looks quite good and free. If a person works for free there are only two choices: he is a complete idiot, or he has enough money to afford it. With your permission, I can put on the Wikipedia a couple of dozen different sources as well as where you can earn money in Wikipedia and on Wikipedia with whom and how. Although I think this is not interesting, because everybody knows it. I would not want to be like those comrades who misrepresented me and my first articles in the Wikipedia, but I want them to read this lastly. User User:Andyjsmith + his administrator User:Nyttend + there fried User:Yunshui All those who destroy, remove, and does not create, support or help people - is causing harm to himself a thousand times bigger than that which they have caused to the person offended or insulted by their destructive actions. This is an energy law. And it works everywhere 100%. The more you'll destroy the worse it will be to you on all levels, that's for sure and certain. One of your friends, by whom I was attacked User:Nyttend, is engaged in Aikido and he knows all these laws. So he did the right thing to resolve the conflict immediately. He is a very good person I think. An interesting point: if a man or a destroyer in your case the vandal (this is the one who destroys without thinking about the consequences and doing it without any warning) - if the vandal will learn over time to reflect negative energy attacks, destroying all his life (health, life, strength, brains, and so etc.), it is completely unknown why all negative energy somehow spreads to his relatives. A very strange fact. A sad example: physicians surgeons. Look at them and their families. 90% of unhappy people - although they do seem quite good things. My advice: until you have at least some chance to get away from vandal way - get out and start helping people, do not try to kill them! Have a nice day! And good luck! Interface Designer (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC) Interface Designer[reply]

Collapsed notes from article creator

Good afternoon, let me add few words in response to your strange accusations and group comments about me and some of my articles.

About the company[edit]

Before you put on the deletion it would be not bad to see what you are removing, and have a look in some original sources.

I will not enumerate all, but merely point out three things only:

Rated turn over of the company's World Marketplace last year was $ 1,427,000.000.00.
It owns 4 large global banks.
It operates simultaneously on 84 international markets.

Conclusion: World Marketplace hardly needs advertising in Wikipedia.

In general, people in this system involves a friendly attitude, an optimistic approach and a lot of completely free services ( for example: all money transfers are commission free to the bank or free hosting, free domain name, etc. )

About the article World Marketplace[edit]

In principle, it can be removed, if you want to do it. I do not care about that.

Just one thing I would ask you to do: please make removement as soon as possible.

It is very desirable to look at this page now. Since the terrible inscription "This article is being considered for deletion ..." can not decorate such respectable System like Wikipedia.

It's not just my opinion. If you decide to leave this article, by adding a few lines, I think, the World will be very grateful to you.

About me[edit]

I wrote a few words about myself. Something will have to be repeated. I'm not a young boy. And Wikipedia is not for money (I have enough money, thank God), and not because I need a career (I've been once working as an editor of a prominent journal, but it's long past time ago. I do not think to move back to this stage).

In fact now I have, unlike many people, free time and I can afford to publish some of my useful life ideas. I think they can bring tangible benefits to mankind in various fields: from micro to macro space, from small to large businesses, from microbiology to medicine. This is one reason why I'm in Wikipedia.

The second reason: I'm more and more attracted by all positive, constructive and, at the same time, disinterested things. In all this lies a gigantic power. At the biggining Wikipedia was also disinterested.

General opinion[edit]

I'm just 24 days in Wikipedia. In that short time I have seen here a lot of interesting ideas and met nice people.

I can not say about everyone, but about some patrols can say this: behind the mask of an instantaneous speedy removals of articles with unselfish in words, lies hidden vandalism and as always happens in such cases: someone's serious interests, visible by the naked eye.

People here tend to operate in pairs user (User talk:Andyjsmith) + user's administrator who help him (User talk:Nyttend), and sometimes catching up friends (User talk:Yunshui) to solve some of there questions.

It's not a secret that all around and even inside Wikipedia industry is making money, but to the outside observer it looks quite good and free. If a person works for free there are only two choices: he is a complete idiot, or he has enough money to afford it.

With your permission, I can put on the Wikipedia a couple of dozen different sources as well as where you can earn money in Wikipedia and on Wikipedia with whom and how. Although I think this is not interesting, because everybody knows it. I would not want to be like those comrades who misrepresented me and my first articles in the Wikipedia, but I want them to read this lastly. User User:Andyjsmith + his administrator User:Nyttend + there fried User:Yunshui

All those who destroy, remove, and does not create, support or help people - is causing harm to himself a thousand times bigger than that which they have caused to the person offended or insulted by their destructive actions. This is an energy law. And it works everywhere 100%. The more you'll destroy the worse it will be to you on all levels, that's for sure and certain. One of your friends, by whom I was attacked User:Nyttend, is engaged in Aikido and he knows all these laws.

So he did the right thing to resolve the conflict immediately. He is a very good person I think.

An interesting point: if a man or a destroyer in your case the vandal (this is the one who destroys without thinking about the consequences and doing it without any warning) - if the vandal will learn over time to reflect negative energy attacks, destroying all his life (health, life, strength, brains, and so etc.), it is completely unknown why all negative energy somehow spreads to his relatives.

A very strange fact. A sad example: physicians surgeons. Look at them and their families. 90% of unhappy people - although they do seem quite good things. My advice: until you have at least some chance to get away from vandal way - get out and start helping people, do not try to kill them!

Have a nice day! And good luck! Interface Designer (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC) Interface Designer[reply]

Comments by other people[edit]

Delete no evidence indication of wp:notability present in article. --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable company and software; bluster and inappropriate accusations do not make the subject meet inclusion guidelines. Acroterion (talk) 13:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability, but we have evidence that this user is spamming. Please note that the content has been saved to User:Interface Designer/drufts/World Marketplace. Nyttend (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Em.. I can't remember - isn't the usual process to MFD attempts to do an end-run around the AFD process? --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, but let's wait until this one concludes: that way, we'll be able to argue that it's an attempt to preserve deleted content. Nyttend (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing we didn't do start an MFD; that page, along with two others in his userspace, have been deleted as spam, since he's now indef blocked for spamming. Nyttend (talk) 22:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 16:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, author of isbn:9783843373272 "is course leader for Fashion Studies at the Arts Institute, Bournemouth, U.K. He has worked as a fashion designer for labels such as Jaeger and Burberry and is engaged in research into sustainable design", so his book could not be considered as a reliable source for software framework, Bezik (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, zero indication of notability, no WP:RS found. The soapboxing at this AfD was good for a couple of lulz though. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.