The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod - Article was prodded with a rationale of "No evidence of notability". An IP posted to the talk page with, "An important book for glbt history. It should be kept on wikipedia in my view. Thanx." I took that for a contest of the prod and removed the prod tag. The article was re-prodded with a rationale of "unsourced article about a book whose author doesn't have one, backed up only by an unsourced assertion that it's an important part of LGBT culture as "the first erotic book that [gay men] could openly buy without having their sexuality exposed". Except, er, no -- the whole beefcake magazine phenomenon predates this book by at least 50 years." LadyofShalott 16:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC) LadyofShalott 16:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]