The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woome[edit]

Non-notable website/company. Insufficient reliable sources to support notability per WP:CORP and/or WP:WEB. All but 2 of the refs are self references, blogs, Twitter or directory type sources and those 2 are of uncertain reliability. ukexpat (talk) 13:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Product-launch announcements aren't enough to build an article on. --Calton | Talk 05:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources seem to be either trivial or not independent. Sam Barsoom 21:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I disagree that the article be deleted as per the guidleines - it should be merged. NY Times Web cam dating is a reliable reference to be added that a competitor SpeedDate.com com uses. As well do a search on Google News woome search and there are more reputable sources (as well as a few PR invalid references). IF woome is to be deleted then SpeedDate.com should be deleted as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.39.190 (talk) 03:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question: merged with what? And please read WP:OSE. – ukexpat (talk) 03:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.