The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Wolfeboro, New Hampshire#Education. So Why 09:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfeboro Camp School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No media coverage and no inherent notability. Fails WP:ORG. It has little to no media coverage, and is not any significant academic institution. It feels promotional, and the article was created by the same author Hyungjoo98, who has written dozens of articles promoting the school. He has received multiple speedy deletion tags on his pages, and has deleted them all. Peapod21 (talk) 03:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of notability, promo. John from Idegon (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wolfeboro,_New_Hampshire#Education, where I merged a ref and where the camp/school is mentioned by name. Not enough reliable sources for a dedicated article. czar 19:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 20:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I have not wrote any promotional material regarding the Wolfeboro Camp School. Secondly, this particular institution has notability as a notable example of a academic summer camp, which has been featured in the mainstream news ex. NY Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/nyregion/taking-summer-school-to-get-ahead-not-catch-up.html) Hyungjoo98 (talk) 09:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, its written. Now that that's aside, I have to point out the source you listed is about NMH's camp, not Wolfeboro. It mentioned it once in a fleeting notice, and never again. If I were to consider a mention of a thing to be press coverage, everything would be on Wikipedia. The article doesn't talk about the camp's merits, notability, or history, but says that a girl just happened to go there before attending a more notable camp. Please, stop promoting institutions you attend or have attended. It makes a waste of everyone's time. alphalfalfa^(talk) 01:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I could support a redirect, based on the nature of a camp as a geographic feature, not in anyway on the notability of said camp. And sorry, when every single one of an editor's edits concern a particular institution or things associated with it, and virtually all have been either reverted or deleted, the problem isn't with Wikipedia in general, it is with the particular editor, who needs to figure this out sooner rather than later. John from Idegon (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.