The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wine and Restaurants magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale, and without addressing the issue for the prod, which is sourcing and notability. An earlier edit did list a rationale for notability, and while the award is hardly notable (the publisher which posts the award has questionable notability, let alone the award), it doesn't meet the standards of notability. A claim was made it was the first and only wine magazine in Vietnam, but I can find no sourcing to back that up, and currently the article is entirely unsourced. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (media). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.