The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, neologism and self-reference. Non-notable, made up one day, etc. —Verrai 23:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikraffiti[edit]

Wikraffiti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Can find nothing to suggest this term is actually being used, reference quoted does not use the term Davewild 21:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The guy invents the term here and says "that’s my word feel free to use it." No thanks! SilkTork *SilkyTalk 21:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Keeper | 76 21:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism at best. The linked Wired story doesn't even use the term in question. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: It is a neologism. - Rjd0060 22:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NEO--Cailil ^talk 23:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.