The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 12:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Subject not seem to meet WP:WEB. It was cited as a reference in "a French well-known road magazine", but did that referencing contain non-trivial coverage about Wikisara we could use to write this article? I see no news results. W.marsh 22:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, just this side of a G7 actually. Almost no notability asserted, nor are there any significant Google hits present. Utterly fails WP:WEB. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, appears to fail WP:WEB.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 03:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: WikiProject Highways has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I originally proposed deletion using ((prod)) for basically the same purpose - it's a completely unreferenced copy of the French Wikipedia article that was added the day before. -- Roleplayer (talk) 21:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for the reasons explained in the discussion page. Route Nostalgie is a reference for the history of French roads although it is not available online and Wikisara seems to have no equivalent for French roads.--Logos36 (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am just afraid that no "road expert" can judge about the relevance of Wikisara's article.--Logos36 (talk) 12:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no assertion of notability. Reviewing the talk discussion page, there is apparently a mention of the website in a French magazine, but the actual citation is not provided so it is impossible to check if it's extensive, if it's independent, if it's noteworthy, or if it's just as a footnote. As is, delete, though no prejudice against recreation if the reference is indeed worthwhile. WLU (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article dedicated to Wikisara in Route Nostalgie is quite similar to the one I have written. Of course, it is more detailed and there are pictures... According to a French contributor of Wikipedia, the website has also been mentionned in another car magazine but unfortunately he can't find the reference.--Logos36 (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.