The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to KMGi Group. Anything of interest can be merged from history subject to editorial consensus. Sandstein 17:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiExperts[edit]

WikiExperts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Gamaliel (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Ironically, you would expect them to have a better article, in so many senses.

More serious Comment - Almost all of their refs, both given and elsewhere, are either OR or short mentions found in general articles on paid editing. The only area where several significant sources are found is the bit that only gets a couple of lines - the suggested introduction of advertising. Digital Trends (Note - while in general the source might work, titling WikiExperts as "analysts" is iffy. More importantly, Jimmy gave a scathing rebuttal to the article at the bottom (worth a read, regardless of the AfD!)) Publico - hole in Wikipedia gives a less...dramatic few paragraphs on them; Wikipedia, a Major Threat to the Reputation of Businesses and Brands (Some by interviewer, then a primary interview, title doesn't sound especially NPOV, although I suppose it's true). I can't see the second ref, so if someone could look and summarise that would be appreciated :) Nosebagbear (talk)

Probable Merge Given that none of the sources either given there or evident elsewhere (surprising dearth of books with mentions of them) are fully reliable I am nervous to give a keep. I would probably be inclined towards merge at Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia#WikiExperts Nosebagbear (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete None of the references meets the criteria for establishing notability. Anything of interest can be Merged with KMGi Group. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.