The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 10:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Westminster Tree[edit]

Delete Vanity Article - Despite a small number of press references, Westminster Tree cannot be considered "notable". It has no official connection to Westminster School. Some Westminster School pupils (who are minors) find the content of Westminster Tree site deeply upsetting. However, since the site is "closed", its content cannot be verified, and might even be illegal. —This unsigned comment is by RichardHindley (talk • contribs) .

The nominator is a member of staff (IT services) of the school.

• Delete as per nom. Bhoeble 18:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not strictly vanity, but not-notable. 131.111.8.104 19:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Lexis/Nexis finds one story in the Evening Standard in 2004. WP article says site was down, now up again and "going strong;" but since it is members only, current status of web site is non-verifiable. Seems to be a borderline notable controversy. Probably should merge and redirect to Westminster School. Thatcher131 20:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable, unverifiable. --Icarus 08:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.