The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 04:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We Were Happy[edit]

We Were Happy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS. The "Background" section is made up of interviews and information about the album, which is WP:PRIMARY. The compact "Composition" section can be merged into the Fearless (Taylor's Version) album article. "Critical reception" is in the context of album reviews, and although this can be acceptable if the song is thoroughly analyzed or discussed, this is not the case. "Charts" alone is not enough for notability per NSONGS. Ippantekina (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2021-04 ✍️ create
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.