The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 13:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wario (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unnecessary disambiguation page, the article Wario mentions the franchise in the hatnote, and the Wario (given name) article is unnecessary because nobody else is named Wario. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 14:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Completely unnecessary. The Wario name page needs to be deleted, as it is a name page listing only the single name. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional delete. It's a bit premature to list the disambiguation for deletion as it's currently a valid disambiguation page linking between Wario, Wario (franchise) and Wario (given name). If the given name page is deleted, then the disambiguation page should then be deleted per WP:TWODABS. If the given name page is kept for whatever reason, the dab also needs to also be kept (although I don't see that happening). -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The given name page is a guaranteed goner, which leaves two entries already handled by a hatnote in Wario. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:34, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.