The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wallington canal[edit]

Wallington canal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Possible hoax article. There is no Wallington canal. Google gives few hits, all from Wikipedia. The majority of the text seems to be a reworking of Croydon Canal, and the sources provided do not specifically mention a canal in Wallington, and mention Wallington itself only in passing. Think outside the box 10:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete almost certainly a hoax. Jack1956 (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Very possibly a hoax; if not, it's certainly not notable anyway. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 12:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Probable hoax; not even a funny one. --Alchemy12 (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Badly-spelt hoax. References 2, 3 and 4 say nothing relevant; reference 5 is about Yorkshire, 200 miles away. JohnCD (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree, looks highly like a hoax. If not, at the least it's non-notable, and the refs given don't even back up the info. --JamieS93 23:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.