The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for Normal[edit]

Waiting for Normal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced article about a YA novel, consisting exclusively of a plot summary and making no actual claim of notability per WP:NBOOK. As always, every book is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- it needs to have an actual notability claim, and reliable source coverage about it. Bearcat (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The book has received a number of awards according to the Amazon page: "School Library Journal Best Book * ALA Notable Children’s Book * New York Public Library’s “One Hundred Titles for Reading and Sharing” * Chicago Public Library Best of the Best * Cooperative Children’s Book Center Choice * Connecticut Book Award Winner * American Library Association Schneider Family Book Award Winner". I think the ALA awards ensure that this meets our notability guidelines for books. Malinaccier (talk) 19:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Mz7 (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Verifiable evidence that has received "major literary awards" and therefore passes WP:NBOOK. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep article could use improved referencing not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.